CPI 4(1)

A Colloquy on the CFI’s Judgment in Microsoft

Eleanor Fox, Apr 24, 2008

Microsoft (EC) and Duty to Deal: Exceptionality and the Transatlantic Divide

This article examines Microsoft´s offense in withholding full information to its workgroup server operating systems rivals so that they could not interoperate with Microsoft´s systems as seamlessly as Microsoft could.

Daniel Beard, Apr 24, 2008

Microsoft: What Sort of Landmark?

The Microsoft judgment was a big decision in the sense that it is long and concerns an important company. If it can be called a landmark decision, what sort of landmark is it?

R. Hewitt Pate, Apr 24, 2008

The Thirteenth Chime of the Clock

Few judgments of the European Court of First Instance (CFI) have attracted as much attention or controversy as the decision in Microsoft Corporation v. European Commission. One aspect of the case dealt with Microsoft´s practice of bundling its own Windows Media Player application with its ubiquitous Windows operating system. The Court upheld a Commission decision that found Microsoft liable under Article 82 and, as a remedy, required Microsoft to produce and market an unbundled version of its operating system called Windows N. But Windows N has failed to sell in the marketplace, and the market position of competing media players has nonetheless grown.

Kelyn Bacon, Apr 24, 2008

Tying after Microsoft: One Step Forward and Two Steps Back?

In the tying part of the Microsoft case, as in the interope

ACCESS TO THIS ARTICLE IS RESTRICTED TO SUBSCRIBERS

Please sign in or join us
to access premium content!